The Conclusions and Recommendations can be combined or, in long reports, presented in separate sections.

The Conclusions and Recommendations can be combined or, in long reports, presented in separate sections.

Conclusions and recommendations

If there are not any recommendations to be manufactured as a result of the project, just call this section Conclusions.

The Conclusions section sums up the key points of one’s discussion, the essential features of your design, or even the significant outcomes of your investigation. As its function is always to round off the story of assembling your project, it should:

  • be written to relate directly to the aims for the project as mentioned when you look at the Introduction
  • indicate the extent to which the aims have already been achieved
  • summarise the key findings, outcomes or information in your report
  • acknowledge limitations and then make suggestions for future work (where applicable)
  • highlight the value or usefulness of your work.

The conclusions should relate with the aims regarding the work:

The aim of this project is always to design a cell phone tower for a suburban location..

The cell phone tower presented here may be erected safely in a suburban street.

It requires a total section of a maximum of 2m 2 l, and it has the following safety features.

This investigation will review the quantity of passengers with the Monash University Clayton-Caulfield inter-campus bus in order to recommend adjustments to your service if required.

Analysis associated with the survey data obtained in this project suggests that usage of the Clayton-Caulfield inter-campus bus has grown by 24% in past times 5 years. It is strongly recommended that frequency be increased during peak usage.

The Conclusions section below is from a known level 2 Civil Engineering Alternative Designs report presenting two designs for a an overpass bridge. Click the buttons that are coloured start to see the comments.


All the two bridge designs Lecturer’s comment:
An elegant beginning for a Conclusions follows on neatly from the preceding discussion. In this case, in addition indicates that the aims of this project have been met. presented in this report fulfil the criteria specified when you look at the project brief. Both designs Lecturer’s comment:
The main findings or outcomes – in this case the key attributes of the designs – are then recapped. Incorporate piers that are round piled foundations, that are used since the soil conditions are unknown and possibly unstable. Design 1, a simple i-girder that is composite, has got the advantage of being made of steel and so has longer spans and fewer piers.

Design 2, a super-T beam br >Design 2 Lecturer’s comment:
The importance of the end result – in this case the ultimate recommendation – is actually stated. is therefore recommended. It provides Lecturer’s comment:
To finish off, the achievement of the project is reinforced. an affordable overpass with superior durability, and fully meets what’s needed of this design brief.

Always address limitations and suggest how they may be overcome in future work. The excerpt below is through the Conclusions of a study on a project investigating the consequence of pulsation on heat transfer in horizontal pipe flow.

Experimental results Lecturer’s comment:
Key conclusions drawn from the project. indicated that pulsed flow without flow reversal had no significant effect compared with steady flow. Preliminary experiments with reversed flow, however, clearly indicated increased heat transfer. It is likely due Lecturer’s comment:
Provide a possible explanation for notable results, especially unexpected ones. to the large disturbances in the boundary that is hydrodynamic when the flow changes direction. Further research Lecturer’s comment:
Recommend further research to handle any extra work you think will be useful. is preferred to determine the utmost enhancement that is achievable.

It must be noted that Lecturer’s comment:
Acknowledge limitations or errors and suggest explanations and/or solutions. the experimental results try not to concur with the equations that are theoretical. This might be as a result of deposits which developed inside the pipe, or to inconsistent thermocouple temperature. Therefore, regular inspection associated with test rig is advised.

For a tremendously long report, it is acceptable to provide the conclusions and recommendations in point form:

The prototype robot courier presented here has been shown to allow you to delivering documents autonomously in an office environment. This has demonstrated listed here aspects of mobile robotics:

  1. Localisation: The Kalman localisation that is filter-based achieved sub-centimeter accuracy under normal operating conditions.
  2. Environment modelling: The occupancy map was updated dynamically to include obstacles not contained in the map that is original.
  3. Path planning: A distance transform-based path planner using obstacle transforms produced a globally optimal local entrapment-free road to the goal.

Leave a Reply